You see the storage warnings. Fixing them is not your core business. It is ours, and we do not sell IT support, so we are not competing with you. Refer the work, or put your own name on it and keep the margin.
Same work underneath. The difference is whose logo is on the report and who the client pays.
You introduce us, we quote the client directly, and you take a referral fee. We stay in our lane: the report covers licensing and storage, and it does not comment on the managed service around it.
We deliver the audit to you, under your brand, and you set the price to the client. You keep the relationship and the margin. We never contact the client directly unless you ask us to join a call.
Impending Tech builds AI systems for organisations that cannot put their data in a public cloud. Most of the work is the assurance around those systems rather than the models themselves. The people who sell you this are the people who do it.
Tim has taken other organisations through their ISO certification and led AI implementation programmes, so he has spent time on the side being assessed rather than only the side doing the assessing. He knows which evidence holds when somebody actually asks for it.
Geoff builds the systems and works in identity. He wrote and delivered a course for academic staff on using AI safely and well.
Licensing and storage work is a fixed piece with an end date. We are not looking to take over anybody’s managed service, which is why an MSP can put us in front of a client without worrying.
Quoted before we start, invoiced on delivery. If the work runs longer than we planned, that is our problem and not your budget’s.
Either sector, or neither. If the answer is that you do not need us yet, that is a fine answer and it costs you one email.